Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859088›Full record

SynthesisCancer causes & control : CCC2025

Lifestyle factors affecting the prognosis of gynecological cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sojung Park, Yaelim Lee

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sojung ParkCollege of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4579-2411
Yaelim LeeCollege of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. ylcaregiver@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-8011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify key lifestyle factors influencing gynecologic cancer prognosis, focusing on recurrence prevention and mortality reduction.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Twenty cohort studies were included, yielding 152 analytical results. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were extracted, and random-effects models were applied when significant heterogeneity was present.

resultsAge (HR 1.58), body mass index (HR 1.18), marital status (HR 1.25), menopausal status (HR 1.44), physical activity (HR 0.91), and race (HR 1.55) significantly influenced gynecologic cancer prognosis. Dairy consumption (HR 1.29) was associated with adverse outcomes, while fruit (HR 0.78) and vegetable intake (HR 0.82) were correlated with improved survival. Diabetes (HR 1.50) and smoking (HR 1.56) were associated with poorer outcomes.

conclusionThis study highlights the significant impact of modifiable lifestyle factors on gynecologic cancer prognosis. Integrating personalized lifestyle interventions into cancer care may improve patient outcomes and survival rates.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleLife StyleFemaleHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsGynecologic neoplasmsLifestylePrognosisRisk factorsSurvival rate

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.