ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Isolation of bacterial extracellular vesicles from raw samples using a portable microstructured electrochemical device.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell Membrane- and Vesicle-Based Bionic Nanodrugs: Applications in Central Nervous System Diseases and Exploration of Nasal-Cerebral Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized vesicles released by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, playing critical roles in microbial communication, host-pathogen interactions, and immune modulation. Despite their significance in research and clinical applications, conventional isolation methods, such as ultracentrifugation (UC), are often slow, labor-intensive, and susceptible to contamination. In this study, we evaluated a novel portable microstructured electrochemical device (PMED) designed for rapid and selective bacterial EV isolation directly from biological samples. Using immunoaffinity-based capture and voltage-triggered release, the device-isolated EVs from Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli), Gram-positive Lactobacillus fermentum (Lb. fermentum) culture supernatants and from urine samples spiked with E. coli , showing superior purity compared to UC. Characterization through nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and Western blot confirms enhanced selectivity and reduced contaminants. Functional assays demonstrated that device-isolated Lb. fermentum EVs selectively activated Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) without triggering TLR2, unlike UC-isolated EVs, suggesting a more refined immunomodulatory effect. These findings highlight the device's translational potential for EV-based diagnostics, particularly for noninvasive urinary tract infection detection, and its broader applications in studying bacterial communication and immune regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.