Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859170›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Perinatal healthcare access, perceived quality, and preferences among historically underrepresented mother-infant dyads: a mixed methods study.

Nicole C Amodio, Victoria Cueto, Elizabeth Znamierowski, Tabassum Firoz, Sarah N Taylor, Ruthfirst E A Ayande, Leslie Sude, Julia Rosenberg

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole C AmodioYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Victoria CuetoYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Elizabeth ZnamierowskiYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tabassum FirozDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Sarah N TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ruthfirst E A AyandeDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Leslie SudeDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Julia RosenbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. julia.rosenberg@yale.edu.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and accessible prenatal and postpartum healthcare supports the health and well-being of the mother-infant dyad, enabling detection and prevention of pregnancy-related complications and chronic conditions. In the U.S., maternal mortality and morbidity are disproportionately higher in Black and Hispanic/Latina women. Focused, intentional dyadic care informed by patient perspectives can improve healthcare access and mitigate inequities.

aimTo understand factors influencing access to and perceived effectiveness of perinatal healthcare for mother-infant dyads by exploring perspectives, preferences, perinatal health knowledge, and opportunities to empower mothers from historically marginalized or underrepresented backgrounds, to promote health advocacy.

methodsIn this mixed-methods study, our interdisciplinary team administered an iteratively developed interview guide and survey with purposively sampled English/Spanish-speaking women who received care at a maternal-infant mobile medical clinic or a postpartum heart health program, settings where patients are primarily covered by Medicaid insurance. Phone interviews were recorded via a videoconferencing app, transcribed with automated software, and edited by research team members. A four-person coding team (two of whom speak Spanish) coded transcripts in original languages in Dedoose. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, and the constant comparative method was applied to identify emerging themes. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantitative data, which consisted of a brief survey of participant demographics, health problems, and preferences for perinatal care.

resultsOf the 22 in-depth interviews (9 Spanish,13 English), half chose either a home or mobile medical clinic visit as their preferred care setting, and half reported a missed clinic-based appointment due to lack of transportation. Key themes reflected postpartum healthcare priorities: (1) multi-level support centered around mother-infant dyad preference (cross-cutting theme); (2) collective well-being (fostering connection and communal experience); (3) improved provider communication and education (to empower self-care and health knowledge); and (4) responsive and personalized perinatal care (meeting women where they are at).

conclusionWomen's perspectives reflected the need for multilevel support with specific attention to community and relationship strengthening, provider engagement, and policy reforms around social support (e.g., benefits and insurance). Findings suggested that prioritizing holistic, patient-centered perspectives may enhance interactions with healthcare systems and contribute to improving perinatal health equity.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMothersPatient PreferencePerinatal CareQuality of Health CareAdultBlack or African AmericanFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited StatesYoung AdultDyadic careEmpowermentHealth educationMaternity carePostpartumPregnancySocial support

Identifiers

PMID40859170
PMCPMC12379449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.