ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Comparative Evaluation of Different Blood Collection Sites for the Assessment of Beta-Hydroxybutyric Acid Concentrations Using a Handheld Meter in Sheep.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Different Blood Collection Sites for the Assessment of Beta-Hydroxybutyric Acid Concentrations Using a Handheld Meter in Sheep.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperketonaemia is a common problem in periparturient sheep. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of FreeStyle Optium Neo H (FS) for measuring blood β-hydroxybutyric acid (BHBA) concentrations in sheep. Whole-blood BHBA concentrations were measured using the FS from the jugular and ear veins of 175 clinically healthy, late-gestation (n = 56) and postparturient (n = 119) ewes. Jugular blood serum samples were also used for the reference sampling site. Blood BHBA concentrations measured with the FS from the jugular and ear veins showed a high positive correlation with the serum concentrations measured using the reference method (r = 0.84, r = 0.81, respectively). According to the Bland-Altman plot and limits of agreement, when compared to the reference method, FS recorded lower BHBA concentrations of 0.03 and 0.04 mmol/L from the jugular and ear veins, respectively. Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed an intercept of -0.125 (95% CI: -0.148 to -0.078) and a slope of 1.250 (95% CI: 1.111-1.304) for the jugular vein and an intercept of -0.005 (95% CI: -0.089 to -0.018) and a slope of 1.000 (95% CI: 0.909-1.111) for the ear vein. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis determined that the optimal thresholds of the FS for the jugular and ear veins were, respectively, ≥0.8 mmol/L (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 97.6%, AUC, 0.896) and ≥0.6 mmol/L (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 91.0%, AUC, 0.887) for the identification of sheep with pregnancy toxaemia (PT). In conclusion, although there was constant and proportional errors indicating non-agreement with the reference method in the Passing-Bablok regression equation, FS's diagnostic performance was good enough to identify ewes with PT or hyperketonaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.