ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Effects of presurgical HIIT in hormone receptor-positive, HER 2-negative breast cancer cases: Two case reports from the GEICAM EFiK study.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of presurgical HIIT in hormone receptor-positive, HER 2-negative breast cancer cases: Two case reports from the GEICAM EFiK study.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a high-intensity interval-training (HIIT) or stretching-balance intervention 3 weeks prior to surgery in two hormone receptor-positive and human-epidermal growth-factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients. Patient 1 (58 years, stage IIA ductal carcinoma) performed a preoperative exercise program, and Patient 2 (63 years, stage IIB ductal carcinoma) underwent stretching-balance intervention. Tumor Ki67, body composition, oxygen uptake, inflammatory biomarkers, and psychological variables were measured before the intervention (T1), and prior to tumor resection (T2). Ki67 remained unchanged in Patient 2 and decreased by 28.6% in Patient 1. Patient 1 maintained her body mass (BM) and body mass index (BMI) with minor variation, while Patient 2 slightly increased her BM and BMI. Both patients increased their fat mass (FM) and %FM and decreased lean body mass (LBM) and %LBM, although to different extents. Peak oxygen uptake increased in Patient 1 and decreased in Patient 2. Interleukin-6 decreased, and C-reactive protein increased in both patients. Patient 1 showed a reduction in depressive symptoms, while Patient 2 exhibited no changes. Based on this case report, presurgical HIIT intervention appears to be a more promising exercise approach. However, larger scale-controlled studies will be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.