ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Development and Integration of Community Advisory Boards to Inform Research on the Impact of Structural Racism on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in End-Stage Kidney Disease.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Abdominal Organ Transplant Access.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunity Advisory Boards (CABs) represent a critical methodological approach to center research on the experiences of patients and families and minimise power inequities between 'researcher' and 'subject'. This approach can be especially important to inform work related to structural racism and racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Herein, we report the value and challenges of integrating CABs into ongoing research on structural racism and racial and ethnic disparities in care for adults with end-stage kidney disease as well as strategies to maximise impact. METHODOLOGY: CABs were assembled to inform a large mixed-methods research project focused on the impact of structural racism on end-stage kidney disease. Qualitative data derived from CAB deliberation were analysed with constructivist grounded theory and used to contextualise research findings and evaluate intervention points.
resultsTwo CABs included 21 adults with kidney disease, caregivers and community members in Pittsburgh and Baltimore. CAB member reflections on research presentations were collected, collated and integrated into ongoing research at multiple stages of development. Further, the members were engaged in the iterative development of the CAB structure itself-including format of meetings from semiannual gatherings to more frequent ad hoc combined meetings-based on member feedback.
conclusionsOur experience identifies opportunities to facilitate a critical shift in the role of patients and community members as study participants to become collaborators in health research and practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: CAB affiliates, who are members of the end-stage kidney disease community, can provide feedback on analyses, suggest and drive lines of inquiry, and contribute to methodological changes including suggesting more frequent meetings. They are collaborators rather than study subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.