ReviewTheranostics2025
Mucus-derived biomaterial dressings: a novel approach to accelerate wound healing.
Review in Theranostics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Histopathological and ultrastructural evaluations of giant African snail (Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound management remains a clinical challenge due to the complexity of healing processes. Traditional dressings with passive protection mechanisms and modern synthetic alternatives often fail to recapitulate the dynamic biological interactions in the wound microenvironment. Mucus is a naturally widely available biomaterial, exhibiting superior bioactive properties as a viscoelastic gel-like substance. Notably, natural mucus derived from diverse biological sources has garnered significant attention as advanced wound dressings. This review explores the potential of natural mucus from animals, plants, microorganisms, and other complex sources as multifunctional wound healing platforms. By analyzing the therapeutic effects of natural mucus, we evaluate its key molecular mechanisms and performance metrics against clinical wound dressings. This establishes a scientific framework for mucus-inspired biomaterials design. The comprehensive assessment not only reveals the untapped potential of renewable biological resources in developing eco-friendly, high-performance wound care alternatives but also provides theoretical guidance for developing next-generation dressings with bioactive, self-adaptive, and environmentally responsive characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.