ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Animal and cellular models of atrial fibrillation: a review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on Clinical Biomarkers Based on the Pathophysiology of Arrhythmias.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Review
- Ion channels and atrial fibrillation: mitophagy as a key mediator.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modeling atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for investigating its pathogenesis and developing new therapeutic strategies. To better explore the mechanisms underlying AF and promote the progress of basic research, it is particularly important to develop accurate animal models that closely simulate the progression of clinical disease. This review summarizes the methods and evaluation criteria for establishing animal and cellular AF models over the past decade, highlighting the advantages and limitations of various models to provide a reference for basic research and treatment of AF. Current experimental animals are primarily categorized into small animals (mice, rats, rabbits), large animals (dogs, pigs, sheep, horses), and model organisms (zebrafish), with modeling methods including electrophysiological induction, chemical induction, trauma induction, and genetic editing. Cellular models commonly use primary cultured cardiomyocytes, the HL-1 cell line, hiPSC-CMs, and H9c2 cells as subjects of study. However, due to the lack of standardized modeling protocols, researchers evaluate AF models based on electrophysiological properties, atrial functional metrics, and biomarkers. Three-dimensional engineered tissues and artificial intelligence, as emerging fields, play an important role in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic monitoring of AF. This paper not only summarizes the current progress in AF model research but also points out the deficiencies of existing models, offering guidance for future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.