ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Artificial intelligence for dental caries detection: A mixup, fine-tuning, and quantization approach on the MobileNetV2 model.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of a You Only Look Once-11s deep learning model and human observers for detection of periapical lesions on intraoral periapical radiographs.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Enhancing deep learning-based dental caries detection through feature pyramid network-based image segmentation.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Training and testing a caries detection model with intraoral scans.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Beta testing and clinical evaluation of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support system for endodontic case assessment.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Effect of Dental Caries on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Young Adults: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Dental caries is among the most common oral diseases worldwide and often goes undetected in its early stages, particularly in underserved regions with limited access to health care. There is an urgent need for early detection tools that are portable, accessible, and powered by artificial intelligence (AI). Aims: This study aims to develop an efficient and accurate AI-based system for early caries detection, using deep learning alongside optimization strategies suitable for deployment on mobile devices in real-world settings. Settings and Design: A lightweight caries classification system was developed based on the MobileNetV2 architecture, optimized using mixup augmentation, fine-tuning, and quantization-aware training to improve performance and efficiency. Materials and Methods: The primary dataset utilized in this study comprises 500 dental images acquired using a smartphone, while a secondary dataset of 5000 images was sourced from publicly available repositories to enhance model generalization. To further augment the dataset and improve the robustness of the AI-based dental caries detection system, an additional 25,000 images were generated through a series of data augmentation techniques. These included random rotations (±20°), brightness adjustments (ranging from 0.9 to 1.1), zoom transformations (±10%), positional translations, and horizontal flipping. As a result, the final training dataset consisted of 25,500 images. Model performance was assessed using standard evaluation metrics, namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Furthermore, model interpretability was examined through Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), providing insights into the regions of interest that contributed most significantly to the model's predictions. Statistical Analysis Used: Comparative statistical analysis was conducted to assess improvements over the baseline model using standard classification metrics. Results: The optimized model achieved 96.0% accuracy and F1-score, with a 72.68% reduction in model size and a 98.28% increase in inference speed. Grad-CAM confirmed anatomically relevant focus. Conclusions: The proposed system provides a practical, accurate, and offline AI solution for caries screening in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.