Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860480›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Predictive value of prognostic nutritional index for the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bing Bai, Xilin Liu, Hong Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bing Bai *Medical Service Dimension, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xilin Liu *Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Nursing, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To present the most recent and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the predictive value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with fractures. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science up to July, 2025 for studies assessing the predictive value of PNI for the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with fractures. The primary outcome measured was mortality. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for data pooling. Additionally, sensitivity and subgroup analyzes were performed to assess the stability of the results and identify potential sources of heterogeneity. All analyzes were performed using Review Manger 5.4 and STATA 15.1. Results: Eight studies encompassing 11,576 elderly individuals were included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that mortality was notably lower in individuals with high PNI compared to those with low PNI (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.85; Conclusion: PNI can effectively predict the long-term mortality in elderly individuals with fractures. Considering the limitations of this article, future large-scale, multicenter prospective cohort studies are still required to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI in senior patients with fractures and its influencing factors. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251047385.

Indexed as

elderlyfracturemeta-analysismortalityprognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID40860480
PMCPMC12375473

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.