ReviewResearch and reports in urology2025
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Oncology: Current Insights and Challenges.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Big Data Analytics in Urologic Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Large-scale Database Research and Clinical Applications.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Exploring advancements in the management of penile cancer in the era of artificial intelligence and machine learning: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Editorial: Genomic discoveries and pharmaceutical development in urologic tumors - volume II.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing the field of urologic oncology, offering novel tools to support for clinical decision-making, enhance diagnostic precision, and assist in surgical and pathological workflows. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches-artificial neural networks, particularly convutional ones-have demonstrated potential across various urologic malignancies, with applications ranging from imaging interpretation and tumor grading to risk stratification and operative planning. While prostate cancer remains the most explored domain, growing interest surrounds AI's use in bladder and renal tumors, and more recently in testicular and penile cancers. Moreover, the integration of AI into robotic surgery and medical writing is opening new frontiers in performance evaluation and patient communication. Despite these advances, critical limitations persist. Issues such as data heterogeneity, lack of external validation, ethical and legal ambiguity, and algorithmic bias continue to hinder widespread adoption. This narrative review examines current developments in AI across major genitourinary cancers, highlighting both clinical opportunities and unresolved challenges in translating these technologies into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.