ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance. Patients and methods: A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury. Results: In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, Conclusions: EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.