SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of Erdafitinib in treating FGFR1-4 mutated solid tumors.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of Erdafitinib in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 mutations. Methods: Search for relevant articles in databases such as PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI, covering the period from their establishment to October 25, 2024. Summarize the adverse drug reaction (AE) data, overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and other relevant data for patients with advanced solid tumors treated with Erdafitinib for FGFR1-4 mutations. Conduct a meta-analysis on the corresponding summarized data using the software Stata 18.0. Results: Through our search, we identified a total of 10 articles involving 1019 patients. In urothelial carcinoma, the most prevalent adverse reactions are hyperphosphatemia (78.5%), diarrhea (56.5%), and stomatitis (51.1%). The most frequently reported adverse reactions in other solid tumors are hyperphosphatemia (66.5%), dry mouth (48.5%), and diarrhea (44.9%). Patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with Erdafitinib exhibit higher median progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared to those treated with other solid tumor therapies. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that Erdafitinib exhibits certain therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 mutations, with the most pronounced therapeutic effect observed in urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy of Erdafitinib in treating other solid tumors requires further confirmation through larger-scale studies involving a broader range of FGFR1-4 mutant tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.