Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861060›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Classification of overweight/obesity among Saudi adolescents relative to lifestyle behaviors using the IOTF or WHO reference standards.

Hazzaa M Al-Hazzaa, Amal Alhakami, Ahlam M Alotaibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hazzaa M Al-HazzaaLifestyle and Health Research Center, Health Sciences Research Center, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amal AlhakamiDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahlam M AlotaibiDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare two BMI classifications (the IOTF and WHO references) in assessing overweight/obesity prevalence among Saudi adolescents and to evaluate the ability of the two standards to detect risks of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. Methods: Healthy Saudi adolescents (15-19 years) were drawn from two data sets ( Results: The proportions (%) of adolescents classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and with obesity varied according to the classification used. The IOTF system produces slightly lower overweight/obesity prevalence than the WHO standards (IOTF: 38.8%; WHO: 40.0%), with females exhibited lower overweight/obesity prevalence than males. The Kappa agreement between overweight/obesity in the two references was high (0.973), with high sensitivity (99.8%) and high specificity (98.0%). Kappa values between central obesity and both IOTF (0.691) and WHO (0.687) were moderate with moderate sensitivity and high specificity. In both classification system, intakes >4 days/week of French fries/potato chips, and chocolates/candy showed higher odds of overweight/obesity. Conclusion: Although overweight/obesity exhibited high Kappa agreement between the two classifications, variations were observed when estimating the prevalence of BMI classification using IOTF or WHO standards. Selected lifestyle behaviors showed significant associations with overweight/obesity in both classification standards.

Indexed as

adolescentBMIIOTFlifestyle behaviorsobesityoverweightunderweightWHO standards

Identifiers

PMID40861060
PMCPMC12375550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.