ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A multicenter retrospective study on anesthesia methods and their impact on neurocognitive outcomes and other complications in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of various anesthesia techniques on perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) and other postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures. Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study analyzed 5,005 elderly patients (≥65 years) with hip fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty and had complete perioperative clinical data. Patients were categorized into five anesthesia groups: a, Combined intravenous-inhalation anesthesia (IVA + IHA); b, IVA + IHA with peripheral nerve block (PNB); c, Intravenous anesthesia (IVA) with PNB; d, Spinal anesthesia (SA); e, SA with PNB. Postoperative delirium (POD) was assessed twice daily during the first 3 postoperative days using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) was evaluated via telephone follow-up on postoperative day 7. Other postoperative complications, as well as 30-day and 6-month mortality rates, were systematically recorded. Results: The analysis revealed no significant differences in POD incidence among the first three anesthesia groups (a/b/c) or between the last two groups (d/e) ( Conclusion: These findings suggest that regional anesthesia may be associated with lower early POD and pulmonary infection rates. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.