ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2025
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran.
Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) prevalence is predicted to rise dramatically in the upcoming years. Although several medications have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in recent years, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to access these medications due to their remarkably high prices. Crizanlizumab, owing to its clinical and economic privileges, appears to be the most suitable option for addition to pharmacotherapy guidelines. However, no study has yet investigated its cost-effectiveness in Iran's healthcare system. Methods: This cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted in 2022 at the Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmaceutical Administration Department of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. A decision-tree model was designed, followed by a cost-utility analysis for crizanlizumab in two separate scenarios, targeting not only monotherapy with crizanlizumab in SCD compared with placebo, but also crizanlizumab's concomitant use with hydroxyurea compared with hydroxyurea. The study reports the outcomes from Iran's healthcare system perspective. Direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years related to vaso-occlusive crisis, hospitalizations, and adverse effects were calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared. SUSTAIN trial was the main clinical source for modeling crizanlizumab's effectiveness in SCD. A sensitivity analysis was performed to measure the sensitivity of outcomes to changes in medication costs. Microsoft Excel 2020 was utilized for calculations and modeling. Results: Concomitant therapy with low-dose crizanlizumab added to hydroxyurea led to the lowest Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 398,881 United States dollars (USD), exceeding Iran's accepted cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analysis results demonstrate that even a 20% reduction in the price of crizanlizumab does not lead to its cost-effectiveness in Iran. Conclusion: Crizanlizumab administration in sickle cell disease is not found cost-effective in Iran, neither as a monotherapy nor added to hydroxyurea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.