Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862008›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Integrating Non-Clinical Supports into Care: A Systematic Review of Social Prescribing Referral Pathways for Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Psychosocial Improvement.

Samantha Spanos, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Louise A Ellis, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Charlotte Officer, Yvonne Zurynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social prescribing for people recovering from treatment for cancer: a systematic scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha SpanosCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-3907
Shalini WijekulasuriyaCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-955X
Louise A EllisCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-4578
Maree SabaCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-9891
Tanja SchroederCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-6542
Charlotte OfficerMacquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Yvonne ZurynskiCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-8717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) involves person-centred integration of non-clinical supports into care, which is critical for addressing mental health and psychosocial needs and enhancing wellbeing. This systematic review evaluated the impact of SP referral pathways on mental health, wellbeing, and psychosocial outcomes. Methods: Four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus) were searched for empirical studies of referral pathways to community-based SP interventions targeting mental health, psychosocial factors and/or wellbeing. Data from studies published from January 2010 to April 2024 were extracted; referral pathways, interventions, and their resultant outcomes were synthesised and tabulated. Results: Across the 30 included studies, 27 SP interventions and two main referral pathways were identified, involving providers across health, community, social, and voluntary care sectors. Quantitative outcomes ( Discussion and conclusion: Research on SP referral pathways supporting mental health, wellbeing and psychosocial outcomes is proliferating, but high heterogeneity in the evidence base limits conclusive inferences about effectiveness. Standardised quantitative measurement of core outcomes, supplemented by rigorous qualitative designs, will enhance capacity to demonstrate the value of an SP approach to integrated care for mental and psychosocial health and wellbeing.

Indexed as

integrated caremental healthperson-centred carepsychosocial needssocial prescribingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40862008
PMCPMC12372674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.