ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Hypertension Cascade Across Three Healthcare Systems and in Relation to the Level of Implementation of the Integrated Care Package.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global disparities in realized stroke prevention attributable to antihypertensive treatment: a population-level analysis of 198 countries, 1990-2019.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Scale-Up of Integrated Care Interventions for Chronic Diseases in Diverse Settings.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We built Cascades of Care (CoC) for hypertension in Belgium, Slovenia and Cambodia, and assessed CoC stratifications across patients' gender and socioeconomic status. Differences between the CoCs were studied by looking at the level of implementation of the integrated care package and other health system characteristics. Methods: A mixed methods design: Age-standardized gender-specific hypertension cascades were built from survey and register data and logistic regression analyses were performed. Focus group discussions with experts were used to interpret these results. Results: In Belgium, the largest gap is between 'prevalence' and 'diagnosis'. In Cambodia, a large drop -especially among men- is found at the beginning and the end of the cascade. In Slovenia, only a limited number of patients is tested and linked to care, but once registered, attrition is quite low. Poor financial situation was a significant determinant of drop-out across the countries but at different stages of the CoC, and especially in Cambodia large gender differences were observed with women being better retained throughout the CoC. Discussion and conclusion: Despite contextual differences between the countries and difficulties in comparability of the cascades, lessons can be learnt from each country's strengths and weaknesses to improve quality of integrated hypertension care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.