Evidence mapPaperPMID 40862124Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Research on podocyte injury mechanisms in diabetic nephropathy: a bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis from 2000 to 2024.

Yanmei Lin, Jianqing Tian

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanmei LinFujian Medical University Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jianqing TianFujian Medical University Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: A bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis is used to explore hotspots evolution and development trends in the Podocyte Injury Mechanisms in Diabetic Nephropathy. By looking for research hotspots and new topics, we can provide new clues and ideas for researchers in this field. Methods: The articles and reviews regarding Podocyte were retrieved and obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on September 1st, 2024. CtieSpace [version 6.2.4R (64-bit)] and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) were used to conduct the bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis. Results: 12086 authors from 2394 institutions in 69 countries/regions published 3239 papers in academic journals. PEOPLES R CHINA and THE USA were absolutely in the leading position in this research field. The institution that contributed the most publications was the Shandong University. Kidney International (130 articles) is the journal with the most published records and the highest number of co-citations. The author with the highest number of co citations is Mundel p. However, there was little cooperation between countries. After 2012, cooperation among various institutions was also small. Autophagy, mitochondria, and epigenetics are hot topics and trends in this field. The most influential research hotspots were the research of podocyte autophagy and metabolism, the related research of SIRT1, VEGF. The latest hotspots and topics included the study of nlrp3 inflammasome and signaling pathway in podocyte injury. The research of Podocyte in Diabetic Nephropathy was a rapidly developing hot field. Conclusion: The damage mechanism of podocytes is a very important factor in the occurrence and progress of diabetes nephropathy. Early intervention of podocyte damage is a very potential preventive measure for diabetes nephropathy, which has clinical application prospects and is currently being rapidly developed.

Indexed as

BibliometricsDiabetic NephropathiesPodocytesAnimalsHumansbibliometrics analysisbibliometrixCiteSpaceDNpodocyte injuryVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID40862124
PMCPMC12375467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.