ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Initial misdiagnosis of gastritis cystica profunda: Two case reports.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastritis cystica profunda (GCP) is a rare gastric disorder. It is characterized by non-specific symptoms and diagnostic complexity. This case report enriches the medical literature by highlighting challenges in diagnosing and treating GCP. CASE SUMMARY: Two patients presented with non-specific abdominal symptoms, such as abdominal distension and epigastric discomfort. Initial misdiagnosis occurred due to GCP's non-typical manifestations. After thorough investigations, GCP was diagnosed. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection were carried out. Both patients recovered uneventfully.
conclusionGCP diagnosis demands caution, and endoscopic treatment is effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.