ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Learning new surgical techniques in low and middle income countries, approval processes, and the impact of artificial intelligence.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The global surgical workforce crisis: narrative review of the role of surgical educator development and technological innovations.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Top 5 Surgical Education Innovations for Low-Resource Settings Over the Last 50 years.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Robotic Thoracic Surgery: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training in surgery and approval of new techniques in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), usually depends on informal apprenticeship systems, that is often lacking standardization, structured mentorship and produce inconsistent patient outcomes. These challenges are particularly severe in rural areas, where training opportunities and healthcare infrastructure are limited. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a reliable solution, providing applicable, Quantitative methods for skill development, competency evaluation and regulatory supervision. AI-powered tools, such as virtual reality (VR) simulations and tele-mentoring platforms, provide independent skill assessments and expand access to high-quality surgical education. However, implementing AI in LMICs faces some challenges, including inadequate resources, financial constraints and ethical issues related to data security and Equitable algorithms. This review compares usual surgical training and approval processes in LMICs and evaluates the promising role of AI to fill existing gaps and compares both approaches in terms of applicability, cost-effectiveness and impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.