Evidence mapPaperPMID 40862250Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Learning new surgical techniques in low and middle income countries, approval processes, and the impact of artificial intelligence.

Long Cong Duy Tran, Helal Metwalli, Dat Tien Le, Samuel Amo-Afful, Mario Salib Todry Gerges, Hajer Hatim Hassan Ahmed, Dinh Thi Kim Quyen, Abdelrahman Gamil Gad, Phillip Tran, Nguyen Tien Huy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Robotic Thoracic Surgery: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Long Cong Duy Tran *Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Helal Metwalli *Faculty of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Dat Tien LeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Samuel Amo-AffulOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
Mario Salib Todry GergesOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hajer Hatim Hassan AhmedOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
Dinh Thi Kim QuyenOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
Abdelrahman Gamil GadOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
Phillip TranInvasive Cardiology Nam Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Nguyen Tien HuyInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training in surgery and approval of new techniques in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), usually depends on informal apprenticeship systems, that is often lacking standardization, structured mentorship and produce inconsistent patient outcomes. These challenges are particularly severe in rural areas, where training opportunities and healthcare infrastructure are limited. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a reliable solution, providing applicable, Quantitative methods for skill development, competency evaluation and regulatory supervision. AI-powered tools, such as virtual reality (VR) simulations and tele-mentoring platforms, provide independent skill assessments and expand access to high-quality surgical education. However, implementing AI in LMICs faces some challenges, including inadequate resources, financial constraints and ethical issues related to data security and Equitable algorithms. This review compares usual surgical training and approval processes in LMICs and evaluates the promising role of AI to fill existing gaps and compares both approaches in terms of applicability, cost-effectiveness and impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehealthcareLMIC (low and middle income countries)residency accreditationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40862250
PMCPMC12370730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.