ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Evaluation of pain scores during intravitreal injection in systemic conditions and in conjunction with medications.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravitreal injection (IVI) is a common practice in today's ophthalmology clinics. The pain that patients will experience after the application may be important in compliance with the treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between various clinical characteristics of patients receiving IVI and corresponding visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (0: no pain to 10: severe pain). Design: Single-centre, Prospective study. Methods: A total of 313 participants (168 females, 145 males) with a mean age of 66.91 ± 9.67 years underwent IVI for diabetic retinopathy (DRP), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Eye examinations, including visual acuity and intraocular pressure measurements, were also conducted, and injection indications were determined based on dilated fundus examinations and spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. Following the injections, the researchers solicited VAS scores ranging from 0 to 10 (no pain to severe pain). The study explored the relationships between clinical characteristics, headache frequency, joint and muscle pain, analgesic use, surgical history, antidepressant use, vasovagal syncope, previous injections, and VAS score. Results: The mean VAS score was 4.77 ± 2.90. While DRP and RVO had similar VAS scores (4.95 ± 2.98 and 5.22 ± 2.70, respectively), the AMD group had significantly lower scores (4.09 ± 2.64). Compared with nonusers, antidepressant users had significantly greater VAS scores (5.79 ± 3.43) (4.52 ± 2.70) ( Conclusion: For individuals experiencing daily headaches, inquiries about vasovagal syncope and antidepressant use may be beneficial, considering the potential association of these symptoms with higher VAS scores after IVIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.