Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862668›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Machine Learning for Predicting Recurrent Course in Uveitis Using Baseline Clinical Characteristics.

William Rojas-Carabali, Carlos Cifuentes-González, Anna Utami, Manisha Agarwal, John H Kempen, Edmund Tsui, Robert P Finger, Alok Sen, Anita Chan, Ariel Schlaen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

William Rojas-CarabaliProgramme for Ocular Inflammation & Infection Translational Research, Department of Ophthalmology, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Carlos Cifuentes-GonzálezProgramme for Ocular Inflammation & Infection Translational Research, Department of Ophthalmology, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Anna UtamiJakarta Eye Centre, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Manisha AgarwalDr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
John H KempenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Edmund TsuiStein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Robert P FingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alok SenSNC Eye Hospital, Jagadhri, India.
Anita ChanSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Ariel SchlaenHospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martín Universidad de Buenos Aires/Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vishali GuptaAdvanced Eye Centre, Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Alejandra de-la-TorreNeuroscience (NEUROS) Research Group, Neurovitae Research Center, Institute of Translational Medicine (IMT), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Bernett LeeLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Rupesh AgrawalProgramme for Ocular Inflammation & Infection Translational Research, Department of Ophthalmology, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
PROTON Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We developed and evaluated machine learning models for predicting the risk of recurrent uveitis using baseline clinical characteristics, to inform clinical decision-making and risk stratification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study registry, including 966 patients (1432 eyes) with uveitis. Three machine learning classifiers-random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and radial basis function support vector classifier-were trained on preprocessed baseline demographic and clinical data. Predictors were selected through bivariate analysis with false discovery rate correction. Models were optimized using grid search with five-fold stratified cross-validation. Performance was evaluated on a hold-out test set using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Shapley additive explanations values for feature importance. Results: The random Forest model achieved the highest test accuracy (0.77), with high specificity (0.93) but modest sensitivity (0.44) for identifying recurrences. eXtreme Gradient Boosting and radial basis function support vector classifier showed comparable accuracies (0.73 and 0.74, respectively) but slightly lower sensitivities. Shapley additive explanation analysis identified vitreous haze, retrolental cells, and noninfectious etiology as key predictors. Learning curves indicated that model performance stabilized with the available sample size, suggesting adequate training data. Conclusions: Machine learning models, particularly random Forest, effectively identified patients at low risk of uveitis recurrence, offering high specificity. However, sensitivity remained limited, highlighting challenges in predicting infrequent events in a heterogeneous disease population.

Indexed as

Machine LearningUveitisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesROC CurveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40862668
PMCPMC12395784

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.