ArticleCells2025
Interpretation of the Transcriptome-Based Signature of Tumor-Initiating Cells, the Core of Cancer Development, and the Construction of a Machine Learning-Based Classifier.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-initiating cells (TICs) constitute a subpopulation of cancer cells with stem-like properties contributing to tumorigenesis, progression, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. Despite their biological importance, their molecular signatures that distinguish them from non-TICs remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze transcriptomic differences between TICs and non-TICs, identify TIC-specific gene expression patterns, and construct a machine learning-based classifier that could accurately predict TIC status. RNA sequencing data were obtained from four human cell lines representing TIC (TS10 and TS32) and non-TIC (32A and Epi). Transcriptomic profiles were analyzed via principal component, hierarchical clustering, and differential expression analysis. Gene-Ontology and Kyoto-Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were conducted for functional interpretation. A logistic-regression model was trained on differentially expressed genes to predict TIC status. Model performance was validated using synthetic data and external projection. TICs exhibited distinct transcriptomic signatures, including enrichment of non-coding RNAs (e.g., MIR4737 and SNORD19) and selective upregulation of metabolic transporters (e.g., SLC25A1, SLC16A1, and FASN). Functional pathway analysis revealed TIC-specific activation of oxidative phosphorylation, PI3K-Akt signaling, and ribosome-related processes. The logistic-regression model achieved perfect classification (area under the curve of 1.00), and its key features indicated metabolic and translational reprogramming unique to TICs. Transcriptomic state-space embedding analysis suggested reversible transitions between TIC and non-TIC states driven by transcriptional and epigenetic regulators. This study reveals a unique transcriptomic landscape defining TICs and establishes a highly accurate machine learning-based TIC classifier. These findings enhance our understanding of TIC biology and show promising strategies for TIC-targeted diagnostics and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.