ReviewBiosensors2025
Updates on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Microscopic and Spectroscopic Characterization of Magnetotactic Bacteria for Biosensor Applications.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CD4Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Natural Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Produced by Aquatic Magnetotactic Bacteria as Ideal Nanozymes for Nano-Guided Biosensing Platforms-A Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2025Pooled it
- Flexible Copper-Based TEM Grid for Microscopic Characterization of Aged Magnetotactic Bacteria MS-1 and Their Magnetosome Crystals in Air-Dried Droplet.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), a unique group of Gram-negative prokaryotes, have the remarkable ability to biomineralize magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) intracellularly, making them promising candidates for various biomedical applications such as biosensors, drug delivery, imaging contrast agents, and cancer-targeted therapies. To fully exploit the potential of MTB, a precise understanding of the structural, surface, and functional properties of these biologically produced nanoparticles is required. Given these concerns, this review provides a focused synthesis of the most widely used microscopic and spectroscopic methods applied in the characterization of MTB and their associated MNPs, covering the latest research from January 2022 to May 2025. Specifically, various optical microscopy techniques (e.g., transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM)) and spectroscopic approaches (e.g., localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)) relevant to ultrasensitive MTB biosensor development are herein discussed and compared in term of their advantages and disadvantages. Overall, the novelty of this work lies in its clarity and structure, aiming to consolidate and simplify access to the most current and effective characterization techniques. Furthermore, several gaps in the characterization methods of MTB were identified, and new directions of methods that can be integrated into the study, analysis, and characterization of these bacteria are suggested in exhaustive manner. Finally, to the authors' knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of characterization techniques that could serve as a practical resource for both younger and more experienced researchers seeking to optimize the use of MTB in the development of advanced biosensing systems and other biomedical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.