ReviewBiosensors2025
Shining the Path of Precision Diagnostic: Advancements in Photonic Sensors for Liquid Biopsy.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasmonic Nanoarray Biosensors for Non-Invasive Cancer Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Paper-Based Biosensors for Monitoring Binding, Blocking, and Surrogate Neutralizing Antibody Responses Against Viral Infections.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Patient-derived resources for decoding and targeting brain metastases ecosystems.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Nanostructured Tin- and Titanium-Based Chemoresistive Sensors for Detecting Volatile Fingerprints from Colorectal Cancer Biopsies and Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Synergistic PdMoCu Trimetallic Metallene-Enhanced Electrochemiluminescence Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Microcystin-LR.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Cell-Based Biosensors in Oral Health: Emerging Tools for Rapid Detection and Monitoring of Oral Diseases.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Surface and Interface Engineering in Integrated Photonic Sensors: Performance Trade-Offs, Stability, and Benchmarking.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Size Enlargement Enabled Functional Profiling of Extracellular Vesicle at Single-Particle Level.Biosensors · 2026Article
- All-LCP Terahertz Metasensor with Dual Quasi-BIC Resonances for Dual-Range Refractive Index Sensing.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Modeling an SPR Sensor for Carcinoma-Related Refractive-Index Detection: The Case of CaFBiosensors · 2026Article
- Nanozyme-Based Colorimetric Assay on a Magnetic Microfluidic Platform for Integrated Detection of TTX.Biosensors · 2026Article
- High-Performance Silicon Nanowire Array Biosensor for Combined Detection of Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy (LB) has gained attention as a valuable approach for cancer diagnostics, providing a minimally invasive option compared to conventional tissue biopsies and helping to overcome issues related to patient discomfort and procedural invasiveness. Recent advances in biosensor technologies, particularly photonic sensors, have improved the accuracy, speed, and real-time capabilities for detecting circulating biomarkers in biological fluids. Incorporating these tools into clinical practice facilitates more informed therapeutic choices and contributes to tailoring treatments to individual patient profiles. This review highlights the clinical potential of LB, examines technological limitations, and outlines future research directions. Departing from traditional biosensor focused reviews, it adopts a reverse-mapping approach grounded in clinically relevant tumor biomarkers. Specifically, biomarkers associated with prevalent cancers, such as breast, prostate, and lung cancers, serve as the starting point for identifying the most suitable photonic sensing platforms. The analysis underscores the need to align sensor design with the physicochemical properties of each biomarker and the operational requirements of the application. No photonic platform is universally optimal; rather, each exhibits specific strengths depending on performance metrics such as sensitivity, limit of detection, and easy system integration. Within this framework, the review provides a comprehensive assessment of emerging photonic biosensors and outlines key priorities to support their effective clinical translation in cancer diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.