Article in Journal of xenobiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Ezequiel Zamora-LedezmaLaboratorio de Funcionamiento de Agroecosistemas y Cambio Climático FAGROCLIM, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Lodana 13132, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-2708
Glenda Leonela Loor AragundiLaboratorio de Funcionamiento de Agroecosistemas y Cambio Climático FAGROCLIM, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Lodana 13132, Ecuador.
Willian Stalyn Guamán MarquinesLaboratorio de Funcionamiento de Agroecosistemas y Cambio Climático FAGROCLIM, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Lodana 13132, Ecuador.ORCID 0009-0006-0585-7742
Michael Anibal Macías ProLaboratorio de Funcionamiento de Agroecosistemas y Cambio Climático FAGROCLIM, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Lodana 13132, Ecuador.
José Vicente García DíazEnvironment Department, PDVSA Intevep, Los Teques, Miranda, P.O. Box 76343, Caracas 1070-A, Venezuela.
Henry Antonio Pacheco GilGrupo de Geomática y Agricultura 4.0, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Lodana 13132, Ecuador.
Julián Mauricio Botero LondoñoLivestock Reconversion Laboratory, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Málaga 682011, Colombia.
Mónica Andrea Botero LondoñoSchool of Electrical, Electronic and Telecommunications Engineering, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga 608002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1706-3182
Camilo Zamora-LedezmaEscuela de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (UAX) Avenida de la Universidad 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8704-1539
Nanofertilizers (NFs) and engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly used in agriculture, yet their environmental safety remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the comparative phytotoxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Phytotoxic Effects and Agricultural Potential of Nanofertilizers: A Study Using Zeolite, Zinc Oxide, and Titanium Dioxide Under Controlled Conditions. · full record | Socratic