ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Artificial Intelligence-Guided Neuromodulation in Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the research landscape of artificial intelligence in heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Cardiac Neuromodulation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Pathways to Clinical Translation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
- Nursing Care of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pathogenic role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in heart failure: clinical features, mechanisms, and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Heart failure: mechanistic insights and precision therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure, a significant global health burden, is divided into heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), characterized by systolic dysfunction and diastolic stiffness, respectively. While HFrEF benefits from pharmacological and device-based therapies, HFpEF lacks effective treatments, with both conditions leading to high rehospitalization rates and reduced quality of life, especially in older adults with comorbidities. This review explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing autonomic neuromodulation for heart failure management. AI enhances patient selection, optimizes stimulation strategies, and enables adaptive, closed-loop systems. In HFrEF, vagus nerve stimulation and baroreflex activation therapy improve functional status and biomarkers, while AI-driven models adjust stimulation dynamically based on physiological feedback. In HFpEF, AI aids in deep phenotyping to identify responsive subgroups for neuromodulatory interventions. Clinical tools support remote monitoring, risk assessment, and symptom detection. However, challenges like data integration, ethical oversight, and clinical adoption limit real-world application. Algorithm transparency, bias minimization, and equitable access are critical for success. Interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical innovation are essential to develop personalized, data-driven, patient-centered heart failure treatment strategies through AI-guided neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.