ArticleJournal of imaging2025
A Lightweight CNN for Multiclass Retinal Disease Screening with Explainable AI.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RetinoMamba-AnatomyQuery: Anatomy-Guided Query Learning for Efficient Vision Impairment Screening from Retinal Fundus Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge Distillation and Explainability Analysis for Lightweight Retinal Disease Classification Using MultiEYE Fundus Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A lightweight deep learning model with channel attention for kidney cell classification from microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely, balanced, and transparent detection of retinal diseases is essential to avert irreversible vision loss; however, current deep learning screeners are hampered by class imbalance, large models, and opaque reasoning. This paper presents a lightweight attention-augmented convolutional neural network (CNN) that addresses all three barriers. The network combines depthwise separable convolutions, squeeze-and-excitation, and global-context attention, and it incorporates gradient-based class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and Grad-CAM++ to ensure that every decision is accompanied by pixel-level evidence. A 5335-image ten-class color-fundus dataset from Bangladeshi clinics, which was severely skewed (17-1509 images per class), was equalized using a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and task-specific augmentations. Images were resized to 150×150 px and split 70:15:15. The training used the adaptive moment estimation (Adam) optimizer (initial learning rate of 1×10-4, reduce-on-plateau, early stopping), ℓ2 regularization, and dual dropout. The 16.6 M parameter network converged in fewer than 50 epochs on a mid-range graphics processing unit (GPU) and reached 87.9% test accuracy, a macro-precision of 0.882, a macro-recall of 0.879, and a macro-F1-score of 0.880, reducing the error by 58% relative to the best ImageNet backbone (Inception-V3, 40.4% accuracy). Eight disorders recorded true-positive rates above 95%; macular scar and central serous chorioretinopathy attained F1-scores of 0.77 and 0.89, respectively. Saliency maps consistently highlighted optic disc margins, subretinal fluid, and other hallmarks. Targeted class re-balancing, lightweight attention, and integrated explainability, therefore, deliver accurate, transparent, and deployable retinal screening suitable for point-of-care ophthalmic triage on resource-limited hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.