Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863705›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of Legislative and Regulatory Frameworks Governing Community Pharmacy in Bulgaria and North Macedonia.

Anna Todorova, Mariya Ivanova, Magdalena Pesheva, Dijana Miceva, Bistra Angelovska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna TodorovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3487
Mariya IvanovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-056X
Magdalena PeshevaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-1177
Dijana MicevaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov Str., No. 10-A, P.O. Box 201, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.ORCID 0009-0009-5474-7461
Bistra AngelovskaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov Str., No. 10-A, P.O. Box 201, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.

Funding

Fund "Nauka" at Medical University of Varna, 22018 'Integrated strategies and models for preventing professional burnout and coping with stress among healthcare professionals' 22018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common border between Bulgaria and North Macedonia, alongside the regulatory requirements stemming from Bulgaria's membership in the European Union, provide grounds for comparing the legislative environment in both countries. This article presents a comparative case study of the regulatory frameworks governing community pharmacies in Bulgaria and North Macedonia. The aim of this study is to examine the specific features of current legislation related to the operation of community pharmacies, and to identify similarities, differences, and gaps in the organizational structure of pharmacy services, the population's access to pharmaceutical care, and the qualification requirements for personnel working in community pharmacies. Bulgaria has been a member of the European Union since 2007, while the Republic of North Macedonia has had official EU candidate status since 2005. This provides a basis for comparing the regulatory frameworks of an EU and a non-EU system within the same regional context. In both countries, the overall pharmacy-to-population ratio exceeds the European average (3.3 pharmacies per 10,000 inhabitants), indicating sufficient availability. However, pharmacies are predominantly concentrated in major urban areas. In Bulgaria, challenges remain in ensuring access to pharmaceutical services in smaller and rural settlements, while in North Macedonia, the provision of such services is better ensured. The findings of this case study may be particularly relevant for countries undergoing health system reforms or EU harmonization processes.

Indexed as

Bulgariacommunity pharmaciesEUNorth Macedoniapharmaceutical legislationpharmacists

Identifiers

PMID40863705
PMCPMC12388963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.