ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Autoencoder-Assisted Stacked Ensemble Learning for Lymphoma Subtype Classification: A Hybrid Deep Learning and Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical vision transformers for Epstein-Barr virus status and histological subtype prediction in Hodgkin lymphoma whole-slide images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- SSDA_AOA: Stacked Sparse Denoising Autoencoder With Archimedes Optimization Algorithm Based Oral Cancer Detection on Histopathological Images.Oral diseases · 2026Article
- Metaheuristic optimization of deep CNNs for multi-class diagnosis of cervical cancer and lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate subtype identification of lymphoma cancer is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. Although standard deep learning algorithms have demonstrated robustness, they are still prone to overfitting and limited generalization, necessitating more reliable and robust methods.
objectivesThis study presents an autoencoder-augmented stacked ensemble learning (SEL) framework integrating deep feature extraction (DFE) and ensembles of machine learning classifiers to improve lymphoma subtype identification.
methodsConvolutional autoencoder (CAE) was utilized to obtain high-level feature representations of histopathological images, followed by dimensionality reduction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Various models were utilized for classifying extracted features, i.e., Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), AdaBoost, and Extra Trees classifiers. A Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) meta-classifier was utilized in an SEL approach to further fine-tune final predictions.
resultsAll the models were tested using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and Average Precision (AP) metrics. The stacked ensemble classifier performed better than all the individual models with a 99.04% accuracy, 0.9998 AUC, and 0.9996 AP, far exceeding what regular deep learning (DL) methods would achieve. Of standalone classifiers, MLP (97.71% accuracy, 0.9986 AUC, 0.9973 AP) and Random Forest (96.71% accuracy, 0.9977 AUC, 0.9953 AP) provided the best prediction performance, while AdaBoost was the poorest performer (68.25% accuracy, 0.8194 AUC, 0.6424 AP). PCA and t-SNE plots confirmed that DFE effectively enhances class discrimination.
conclusionThis study demonstrates a highly accurate and reliable approach to lymphoma classification by using autoencoder-assisted ensemble learning, reducing the misclassification rate and significantly enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis. AI-based models are designed to assist pathologists by providing interpretable outputs such as class probabilities and visualizations (e.g., Grad-CAM), enabling them to understand and validate predictions in the diagnostic workflow. Future studies should enhance computational efficacy and conduct multi-centre validation studies to confirm the model's generalizability on extensive collections of histopathological datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.