SynthesisToxins2025
Botulinum Toxin Effects on Biochemical Biomarkers Related to Inflammation-Associated Head and Neck Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Research.
Synthesis in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Botulinum toxin effects on biochemical biomarkers related to inflammation-associated head and neck chronic conditions: a systematic review of clinical research.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and early biochemical responses to botulinum toxin type-A in refractory masticatory myofascial pain: a pilot single-arm study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Central and Peripheral Sensitization in Temporomandibular Disorders: Proposed Mechanisms of Botulinum Toxin Therapy.Toxins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current research reported that the number of clinical studies found for botulinum toxin (BoNT) key effects on biochemical biomarkers in head and neck chronic conditions linked to inflammation was very low. There are no systematic reviews of animal studies on this topic, and hence our review aimed to evaluate the quality of the preclinical evidence. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and registries up to 29 January 2024. There were 22 eligible records, and data were available for 11 randomised controlled trials. There were concerns about the risk of bias and great variations of data obtained regarding chronic conditions, which included mostly trigeminal neuralgia. The leading biomarkers were proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α) and synaptosomal-associated protein-25 (SNAP25), followed by neuron activation marker c-Fos and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Overall, data found that BoNT significantly altered the under/over-expression of biomarkers evoked by the investigated disease models and had no effect when the levels of these biomarkers were not changed by the induced chronic conditions in animals. However, there were some mixed results and exceptions, and the certainty evidence found was very low to low. Although the sample sizes detected significant effect size (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.