ArticleGeroScience2026
Integrative machine learning approach to risk prediction for dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a growing global health challenge characterized by cognitive decline, behavioral changes, and loss of independence. With increasing life expectancy, early diagnosis and improved clinical strategies are urgently needed. This study developed and evaluated machine learning (ML) models to predict AD risk using UK Biobank data, integrating health, genetic, and lifestyle factors. The cohort included 2878 AD cases and 72,366 controls. Among several algorithms, CatBoost performed best (ROC-AUC = 0.773), especially in females. Inputs included ICD-10 codes from 5 years pre-diagnosis, ApoE-ε4 genotype, and large collection of modifiable risk factors. Despite fewer cases, the risk predictive models for vascular dementia (VaD) outperformed the unique AD models. ApoE-ε4 was the most predictive genetic marker, while other common variants had limited utility. Key non-genetic predictors included comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), education, physical activity, and diet. These findings highlight the value of integrating diverse data sources for dementia risk prediction and emphasize the role of sex-specific modeling and modifiable factors in early, personalized intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.