Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864401›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Integrative machine learning approach to risk prediction for dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Amos Stern, Michal Linial

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amos SternThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michal LinialDepartment of Biological Chemistry, The Life Science Institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Jerusalem, Israel. michall@cc.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-4526

Funding

National Alopecia Areata Foundation 2023Shemesh (HUJI-SZMC) 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a growing global health challenge characterized by cognitive decline, behavioral changes, and loss of independence. With increasing life expectancy, early diagnosis and improved clinical strategies are urgently needed. This study developed and evaluated machine learning (ML) models to predict AD risk using UK Biobank data, integrating health, genetic, and lifestyle factors. The cohort included 2878 AD cases and 72,366 controls. Among several algorithms, CatBoost performed best (ROC-AUC = 0.773), especially in females. Inputs included ICD-10 codes from 5 years pre-diagnosis, ApoE-ε4 genotype, and large collection of modifiable risk factors. Despite fewer cases, the risk predictive models for vascular dementia (VaD) outperformed the unique AD models. ApoE-ε4 was the most predictive genetic marker, while other common variants had limited utility. Key non-genetic predictors included comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), education, physical activity, and diet. These findings highlight the value of integrating diverse data sources for dementia risk prediction and emphasize the role of sex-specific modeling and modifiable factors in early, personalized intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overApolipoprotein E4Dementia, VascularFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited KingdomApolipoprotein E4APOEAUCFeature selectionGWASPWASSHAP valuesUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID40864401
PMCPMC12972432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.