Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864459›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2025

Survival After Initial Stress Testing vs Anatomic Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Long-Term Follow-Up of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pamela S Douglas, Amanda Stebbins, Borek Foldyna, Manesh R Patel, Daniel B Mark, Michael T Lu, Udo Hoffmann, Svati H Shah, Beth Martinez, Brooke Alhanti and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01174550 (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01174550 nacompletednot on this map

PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled10,003ConditionsChest PainArmsCoronary Angiography, Stress Echocardiogram, Nuclear Stress Test, Exercise Electrocardiogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Amanda StebbinsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Borek FoldynaCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Manesh R PatelDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel B MarkDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael T LuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Udo HoffmannCleerly Inc, Denver, Colorado.
Svati H ShahDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Beth MartinezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Brooke AlhantiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Neha PagidipatiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Clinical Coordinating CenterR01HL098237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS, PAMELA SUSAN · 2009 to 2014
$27.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) often require noninvasive testing for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. Objective: To determine long-term outcomes in patients randomized to functional (stress) vs anatomic (coronary computed tomographic angiography [CTA]) initial testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a 2025 follow-up analysis of mortality of participants in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) randomized clinical trial, which was conducted from 2009 to 2014, using a 2024 National Death Index search. Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.6 (9.9-11.3) years; maximum follow-up was 12.4 years. PROMISE was conducted at 193 multispecialty outpatient sites in North America among 10 003 symptomatic patients requiring testing for suspected CAD. Data analysis was conducted from August 2024 to March 2025. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to initial CTA or stress testing. Testing and subsequent care were performed by sites according to usual practices. Main Outcomes and Measures: The PROMISE trial's original primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina hospitalization, or major procedural complication. The primary end point for extended follow-up was all-cause death, with cardiovascular (CV) death as a secondary end point. Results: At enrollment, mean (SD) participant age was 61 (8) years, 5270 participants (52.7%) were women, and 8762 (87.6%) had chest pain or dyspnea. Death occurred in 1128 participants (14.4%), including 558 (14.3%) in the CTA arm and 570 (14.5%) in the stress arm (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87-1.10). There was no demonstrable difference in cardiovascular mortality, although the point estimate favored CTA (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.05; adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.94). There were no significant interactions between all-cause death or CV death and study arm by age (<60 or ≥60 years) (P value for interaction = .19), gender (P value for interaction = .60), or race and ethnicity (P value for interaction = .47). A CTA indicating any degree of abnormality, including mild (nonobstructive CAD), moderate, and severe findings, conferred elevated adjusted HRs of death (1.99-3.44; all P < .001) compared to normal study results. Among stress testing results, only a severe abnormality was prognostically significant (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.91). In landmark analyses of those alive at 90 days, there were no interactions between randomized testing and use of statins (P value for interaction = .22), β-blockers (P value for interaction = .76), or antiplatelet agents (P value for interaction = .49). Conclusions and Relevance: In long-term follow-up of the PROMISE randomized clinical trial, initial noninvasive test selection in patients with stable symptoms of suspected CAD did not affect all-cause or CV mortality at 10 years. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestAgedCause of DeathChest PainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID40864459
PMCPMC12392145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.