ArticleJAMA network open2025
Peripheral Vasopressor Use in Early Sepsis-Induced Hypotension.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07511582 (Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Methylprednisolone in Critically Ill Patients With the Hyperinflammatory Phenotype), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Methylprednisolone in Critically Ill Patients With the Hyperinflammatory Phenotype: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence of Adverse Events in Peripheral Intravenous Vasopressor Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- A Descriptive Overview of Deviations From an Institutional Peripheral Vasopressor Protocol and Its Effects on Safety Across an Academic Health System.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Current and future strategies aiming at reducing catecholamine exposure in septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Navigating the veins: A comprehensive review of vasoactive agent infusionWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- The evolution of sepsis care: from protocol-driven management to personalized intensive care.Infection · 2026Review
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Safety of Administration of Vasopressors Through Peripheral Compared to Central Venous Catheters in a Rural Kenyan Hospital: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Utility of a Peripheral Intravenous Catheter for Administration of Vasopressors: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Unnecessary fluid therapy in patients with shock: Five classic fluid pitfalls and five ways to do it better.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Barriers and opportunities to improve fluid balance recognition and reduction: a qualitative study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Evidence supporting the safety of infusing vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters (peripheral vasopressors) is largely derived from single-center studies, limiting generalizability. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with vasopressor route selection and assess safety and clinical outcomes of peripheral vasopressor administration in early sepsis resuscitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study is a secondary analysis of the Crystalloid Liberal vs Early Vasopressors in Sepsis (CLOVERS) trial conducted in 60 US hospitals from March 2018 to February 2022. Patients in CLOVERS who received vasopressors within 24 hours of enrollment and did not have central venous access at enrollment were included. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to June 2025. Exposure: Route of vasopressor initiation (central or peripheral). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary analysis evaluated the route of vasopressor initiation, while the secondary analysis assessed continuation of peripheral vasopressors beyond 6 hours. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with vasopressor route were conducted, as was a multivariable analysis to evaluate the association of route with outcomes, including 90-day mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize 28-day peripheral vasopressor and central venous catheter (CVC) complications. Results: Of 1563 patients in CLOVERS, 582 (37.2%) received vasopressors and met study inclusion criteria. Included patients had a median (IQR) age of 63 (52-72) years, and 267 (45.9%) were female, 96 (16.5%) were African American, 416 (71.5%) were White, and 70 (12.0%) were another race or had unreported race. Vasopressors were initiated via peripheral catheter in 490 patients (84.2%) and via central venous access in 92 patients (15.8%). Study site was the only factor independently associated with route of initiation (median odds ratio, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.57-5.38). In adjusted analyses, peripheral vs central initiation was associated with statistically comparable 90-day mortality (128 participants [26.1%] vs 34 participants [37.0%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.39-1.16). Peripheral vasopressors were continued beyond 6 hours in 333 of 490 patients (68.0%). Peripheral vasopressor complications were rare and low-grade (3 of 490 patients [0.6%]), with no cases of ulceration or tissue injury. In contrast, there were 14 complications from CVC placement occurring in 12 of 322 patients (3.7%) who had CVCs placed in the first 72 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study of the CLOVERS trial, peripheral administration of vasopressors was common and was associated with low complication rates. These findings support the safety and feasibility of short-term peripheral vasopressor use in early sepsis resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.