Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864467›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Peripheral Vasopressor Use in Early Sepsis-Induced Hypotension.

Elizabeth S Munroe, Ivan N Co, Ivor Douglas, Robert Hyzy, Akram Khan, Kristine Nelson, Pauline K Park, Ithan D Peltan, Todd W Rice, Sarah Seelye and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07511582 (Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Methylprednisolone in Critically Ill Patients With the Hyperinflammatory Phenotype), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07511582 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Methylprednisolone in Critically Ill Patients With the Hyperinflammatory Phenotype: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBin DuRan2026 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsSepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsMethylprednisolone (MP), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elizabeth S MunroeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ivan N CoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ivor DouglasDivision of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Robert HyzyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Akram KhanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Kristine NelsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Pauline K ParkDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ithan D PeltanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Health, Murray, Utah.
Todd W RiceDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sarah SeelyeVA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Wesley H SelfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Nathan I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hallie C PrescottDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
NHLBI PETAL Network

Funding

Measuring and Learning from Care Variation in SepsisR35GM151147 · NIGMS · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI Ithan Daniel Peltan · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Developing and Evaluating a Personalized Approach to Initial Fluid Resuscitation in Patients with Hospital-Onset SepsisK23HL177175 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Elizabeth Munroe · 2025 to 2026
$346k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL177175NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL170379NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Evidence supporting the safety of infusing vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters (peripheral vasopressors) is largely derived from single-center studies, limiting generalizability. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with vasopressor route selection and assess safety and clinical outcomes of peripheral vasopressor administration in early sepsis resuscitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study is a secondary analysis of the Crystalloid Liberal vs Early Vasopressors in Sepsis (CLOVERS) trial conducted in 60 US hospitals from March 2018 to February 2022. Patients in CLOVERS who received vasopressors within 24 hours of enrollment and did not have central venous access at enrollment were included. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to June 2025. Exposure: Route of vasopressor initiation (central or peripheral). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary analysis evaluated the route of vasopressor initiation, while the secondary analysis assessed continuation of peripheral vasopressors beyond 6 hours. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with vasopressor route were conducted, as was a multivariable analysis to evaluate the association of route with outcomes, including 90-day mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize 28-day peripheral vasopressor and central venous catheter (CVC) complications. Results: Of 1563 patients in CLOVERS, 582 (37.2%) received vasopressors and met study inclusion criteria. Included patients had a median (IQR) age of 63 (52-72) years, and 267 (45.9%) were female, 96 (16.5%) were African American, 416 (71.5%) were White, and 70 (12.0%) were another race or had unreported race. Vasopressors were initiated via peripheral catheter in 490 patients (84.2%) and via central venous access in 92 patients (15.8%). Study site was the only factor independently associated with route of initiation (median odds ratio, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.57-5.38). In adjusted analyses, peripheral vs central initiation was associated with statistically comparable 90-day mortality (128 participants [26.1%] vs 34 participants [37.0%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.39-1.16). Peripheral vasopressors were continued beyond 6 hours in 333 of 490 patients (68.0%). Peripheral vasopressor complications were rare and low-grade (3 of 490 patients [0.6%]), with no cases of ulceration or tissue injury. In contrast, there were 14 complications from CVC placement occurring in 12 of 322 patients (3.7%) who had CVCs placed in the first 72 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study of the CLOVERS trial, peripheral administration of vasopressors was common and was associated with low complication rates. These findings support the safety and feasibility of short-term peripheral vasopressor use in early sepsis resuscitation.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralHypotensionSepsisVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID40864467
PMCPMC12391982

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.