Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40865026›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2025

Association Between Menopause Age and Estradiol-Based Hormone Therapy With Cognitive Performance in Cognitively Normal Women in the CLSA.

Tanvi A Puri, Laura L Gravelsins, Madeline Wood Alexander, Andrew J McGovern, Paula Duarte Guterman, Jennifer S Rabin, Kelly J Murphy, Liisa A M Galea

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Age at menopause,Research square · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Sex differences in neuromodulatory subcortical systems and their implications for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanvi A PuriGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-4153
Laura L GravelsinsCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-9199
Madeline Wood AlexanderRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4598-0201
Andrew J McGovernCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paula Duarte GutermanDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer S RabinRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-2221
Kelly J MurphyNeuropsychology & Cognitive Health, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Liisa A M GaleaDjavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2874-9972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMenopause and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) affect cognition, although existing studies are inconclusive. Age-related declines in executive functions, episodic memory, and prospective memory may be differentially sensitive to menopause age and MHT, due to variations in which brain regions are involved and their estrogen receptor density. Few studies have explored how menopause age and estradiol (E2)-based MHT by administration route affect these domains, a gap that this study addresses.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional observational cohort study using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging. We separately examined the associations of age at menopause and E2-based MHT with performance in 3 cognitive domains: episodic memory, prospective memory, and executive functions. Linear regression models were used the test the association between cognitive performance and menopause variables.

resultsThis cohort included 7,251 postmenopausal women (mean age at baseline 60.5 ± 10.2 years, mean age at menopause 50.5 ± 4.2 years), with models adjusted for age, education, and vascular risk. Earlier age at menopause was significantly associated with lower scores across all cognitive domains tested (episodic memory β = 0.050, 95% CI 0.027-0.072, DISCUSSION: E2-based MHT efficacy depends on the route of administration and cognitive domain, underscoring the importance of considering MHT type. Although we cannot establish causality between menopause age, MHT use, and cognitive outcomes, this work provides clarity to inconsistencies in the literature and informs precision medicine approaches for cognitive aging. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that use of E2-based MHTs was associated with higher episodic memory scores (transdermal E2 preparations) or higher prospective memory scores (oral E2 preparations) in postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

CognitionEstradiolEstrogen Replacement TherapyExecutive FunctionMenopauseAgedAge FactorsAgingCanadaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMemory, EpisodicMiddle AgedEstradiol

Identifiers

PMID40865026
PMCPMC12380479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.