ArticleScientific reports2025
Flow velocity and boundary effects on fish interaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of 'Hydraulic-Visual' Interaction on the Intensity of Fish Schooling in the Upstream Movement of Juvenile Silver Carp.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on the Upstream Migration Behavior of AdultAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How do environmental cues shape the coordination rules underlying collective motion in fish shoals? This question is crucial as freshwater migratory fish are globally declining due to river fragmentation, and collective motion is known to influence the effectiveness of fish pass solutions. However, experimental data on individual interactions and the effects of solid boundaries and hydrodynamic conditions remain limited. Adopting a reductionist approach - using fish pairs as the minimal shoal's unit - we examined how mean flow velocity and boundary proximity affect interaction dynamics in a riverine species. Towards this end, we tracked pairs of Italian riffle dace (Telestes muticellus) across three bulk flow velocities (2, 4 and 7 BL/s) and four regions in a confined open channel flow. We found shoaling time to be flow-invariant; however, fish shifted from side-by-side to in-line formations as flow increased, especially near walls. Correlation analysis revealed stronger velocity coupling at short distances (< 6 BL) that remain largely stable across flow velocities. Response times differed by coordination direction: longitudinal responses (~ 0.5 s) were flow-invariant and symmetrical between lead and rear fish, while lateral responses primarily involved the rear fish reacting to the front one, and accelerated with increasing flow. Longitudinal coordination emerged only near side walls and in the central region, whereas lateral coupling peaked in central areas and strengthened with increasing flow. These findings reveal how physical context shapes coordination in riverine fish and provide empirical insights for fish pass design and fish movement modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.