Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866468›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced deep learning modeling to enhance detection of defective photovoltaic cells in electroluminescence images.

Mostafa A Ebied, Amr Munshi, Shakir A Alhuzali, Mohamed M El-Sotouhy, Amr I Shehta, M S Elborlsy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mostafa A EbiedElectronics Technology Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Beni-Suef University, Banī Suwayf, Egypt.
Amr MunshiDepartment of Computer and Network Engineering, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Shakir A AlhuzaliCollege of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed M El-SotouhyPower Electronics and Energy Conversion Department, Electronics Research Institute (ERI), Cairo, Egypt.
Amr I ShehtaDepartment of Information System, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
M S ElborlsyProcess Control Technology Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt. mohamedsaad@techedu.bsu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper discusses a deep learning approach for detecting defects in photovoltaic (PV) modules using electroluminescence (EL) images. The method addresses key challenges in two practical areas: Creating high-quality EL images to overcome imbalance issues in existing datasets. This is accomplished by employing generative adversarial network (GAN) properties to generate new images. Enhancing training efficiency and performance through a one-cycle policy with optimized learning rate settings, designed to overcome hardware limitations. The research highlights that while automatic defect classification in PV modules is gaining attention as an alternative to visual/manual inspection, the process remains challenging due to the inhomogeneous nature of cell cracks and complex backgrounds in crystalline solar cells. A comparison was made between popular deep learning models (Densenet169, Densenet201, Resnet101, Resnet152, Senet154, Vgg16, and Vgg19) to assess the effectiveness of our approaches on multiple variants of our dataset. We also observe a shift in the phenomenon of moving the threshold in regression estimates because of employing a policy that uses a dynamic threshold instead of a standard threshold (0.5). We have employed two different categorizations that use binary numbers; the first employs four classes (0%, 33%, 67%, and 100%), while the second employs eight classes that are identical to four classes. However, each class has two varieties (monocrystalline and polycrystalline) and a boundary beyond which results will be obtained. Based on the performance results, it was found that the pre-trained Resnet152 model achieved the highest classification accuracy (90.13% for Datasets) of all approaches. Additionally, we have demonstrated that approaches that utilize over-sampling have the greatest performance. These findings emphasize the strength and innovation of our approach, combining advanced data augmentation, adaptive thresholding, and optimized learning strategies. The proposed system not only achieved a peak classification accuracy of 90.13% using ResNet152 but also demonstrated high robustness, reduced training time, and superior generalization across defect types and cell categories. This positions our framework as a scalable and deployment-ready solution for real-world photovoltaic quality inspection systems.

Indexed as

Deep learningDefect classificationElectroluminescence imagingGenerative adversarial networkPhotovoltaic (PV)Regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID40866468
PMCPMC12391306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.