ArticleScientific reports2025
Stepwise approach to alzheimer's disease diagnosis in primary care using cognitive screening, risk factors, neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Multimodal Machine Learning for Risk Enrichment Across the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From fragmented neurotechnologies to closed-loop brain health systems: integrating artificial intelligence, digital health, digital twins, and advanced materials for brain disorders.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cognitive Age Delta as a Marker of Healthy and Pathological Cognitive Aging: The Role of Lifestyle, Cognitive Reserve, and Vascular Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- From cognitive screening to digital phenotyping: rethinking early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is essential for timely intervention, particularly in primary care. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a scalable, multimodal framework in a real-world, population-based cohort. A total of 277 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 60 years from the STOP-ALZHEIMER DEBA study (Basque Country, Spain) underwent brief cognitive screening (MMSE, M@T, Fototest, AD8) with optimized cut-offs, along with clinical risk assessment. Among them, 181 participants also completed structural MRI, plasma biomarker profiling (p-tau181, Aβ42/40, GFAP, NfL), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. We assessed performance for detecting cognitive impairment, CSF amyloid positivity (A+), and combined amyloid-tau positivity (A + T+). Optimized cognitive tests showed moderate accuracy (AUC 0.66-0.77), with the Fototest performing best. For biological outcomes, GFAP and p-tau181 had the highest predictive value (AUCs: 0.813 and 0.755 for A+; 0.852 and 0.710 for A + T+), and their combination further improved accuracy (AUC = 0.842). Fully adjusted models incorporating optimized cognitive scores, plasma biomarkers, APOE genotype, MRI, and demographics achieved high diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.886 for A+; 0.893 for A + T+). Results were consistent across sex and age strata. These findings support a stepwise diagnostic strategy combining brief, minimally invasive tools to enhance early AD detection in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.