Next-generation enteric neuroscience - fostering the future of the field.

Anoohya N Muppirala, Mitchell T Ringuet, Alain J Benitez, Kristen M Smith-Edwards, Keith A Sharkey, Nathalie Vergnolle

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anoohya N MuppiralaDepartment of Paediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. muppirala.anoohya@gene.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6810-4127

Mitchell T RinguetMolecular and Translational Pharmacology, Rosenkilde Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences (BMI), Copenhagen, Denmark. Mitchell.ringuet@sund.ku.dk.

Alain J BenitezDepartment of Paediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. BenitezA@chop.edu.

Kristen M Smith-EdwardsPhysiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. edwards.kristen@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-4454

Keith A SharkeyHotchkiss Brain Institute and Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. ksharkey@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-1711

Nathalie VergnolleToulouse University, IRSD, INSERM, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France. nathalie.vergnolle@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-6015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Little Brain Big Brain meeting was established more than 30 years ago as an opportunity for early career researchers to meet, present and discuss exciting new developments in the field of enteric neuroscience and neurogastroenterology. Crucially, the meeting is organized by young investigators, for young investigators. In this Viewpoint, past attendees and organizers of the Little Brain Big Brain meeting discuss their research interests, share their experience with this unique meeting and provide insights into progress in the field of enteric neuroscience and neurogastroenterology and its future outlook.

Indexed as

Enteric Nervous SystemGastroenterologyNeurosciencesAnimalsCongresses as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID40866552

DOI10.1038/s41586-020-03118-2

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.