Evidence mapPaperPMID 40866601Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2025

Assessing the sensitisation hazard of microbial pesticides: potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to overcome current challenges.

Daniela Morais Leme, Cynthia Bomfim Pestana, Elaine F Kenny, Sabrina Feustel, Philip Marx-Stoelting, Emanuela Corsini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela Morais LemeDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7164-1276
Cynthia Bomfim PestanaDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Elaine F KennyGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Sabrina FeustelGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Philip Marx-StoeltingGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Emanuela CorsiniLaboratory of Toxicology, Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Rodolfo Paoletti', Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133, Milan, Italy. emanuela.corsini@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-5956

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES/Humboldt Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past years, the use of chemical pesticides has increased considerably worldwide, and concerns about human health and the environment have stimulated the development of safer alternatives. Biopesticides, including those with microorganisms as active substances, i.e. microbial pesticides, appear to be specific in action, easily sourced without the need for expensive chemicals, and environmentally sustainable with no residual effects. As such, they are seen as a viable alternative to synthetic pesticides. As with any other plant protection product, microbial pesticides are subjected to regulatory approval before marketing, and sensitisation, either via the dermal and/or inhalation routes, is one of the data requirements that have to be addressed in this process. The biological mechanisms underlying potential concerns related to sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides are reviewed in this article. Mechanistic knowledge was utilised to understand the potential limitations of current testing strategies for assessing sensitisation hazards, primarily defined by chemicals, as well as to demonstrate the potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in this process. However, evaluating the sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides requires several protocol adaptations to achieve adequate confidence levels for alternative methods, narrow their applicability domain, and provide potency information on this endpoint. The technical limitations and difficulties in interpreting the results of current testing methods applied to microbial pesticides have long been recognised and are discussed in this article to better drive propositions of NAM-based strategies for microbial pesticides.

Indexed as

PesticidesToxicity TestsAnimalsHumansRisk AssessmentPesticidesMicrobial pesticidesMicroorganismsNew approach methodologiesRespiratory sensitisationSkin sensitisation

Identifiers

PMID40866601
PMCPMC12477079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.