ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Assessing the sensitisation hazard of microbial pesticides: potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to overcome current challenges.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past years, the use of chemical pesticides has increased considerably worldwide, and concerns about human health and the environment have stimulated the development of safer alternatives. Biopesticides, including those with microorganisms as active substances, i.e. microbial pesticides, appear to be specific in action, easily sourced without the need for expensive chemicals, and environmentally sustainable with no residual effects. As such, they are seen as a viable alternative to synthetic pesticides. As with any other plant protection product, microbial pesticides are subjected to regulatory approval before marketing, and sensitisation, either via the dermal and/or inhalation routes, is one of the data requirements that have to be addressed in this process. The biological mechanisms underlying potential concerns related to sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides are reviewed in this article. Mechanistic knowledge was utilised to understand the potential limitations of current testing strategies for assessing sensitisation hazards, primarily defined by chemicals, as well as to demonstrate the potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in this process. However, evaluating the sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides requires several protocol adaptations to achieve adequate confidence levels for alternative methods, narrow their applicability domain, and provide potency information on this endpoint. The technical limitations and difficulties in interpreting the results of current testing methods applied to microbial pesticides have long been recognised and are discussed in this article to better drive propositions of NAM-based strategies for microbial pesticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.