ReviewEmergency radiology2025
The role of dual-energy CT in head and neck emergency.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been widely used in acute clinical settings to add diagnostic confidence and accuracy in head and neck imaging. Given the complexity of the head and neck anatomy, delayed or inaccurate diagnosis of abnormalities involving the head and neck region can result in poor outcomes and possibly life-threatening consequences. This article aims to familiarize radiologists with the clinical applications and limitations of DECT in emergency head and neck imaging to maintain interpretative accuracy and improve patients' outcomes. Here, we demonstrate the profound capabilities of DECT for detecting and characterizing pathologies in the head and neck region with its superior abilities to differentiate materials, improve contrast enhancement, and reduce beam hardening artifacts. The robust imaging protocols and diverse post-processing algorithms of DECT enable radiologists to make diagnoses more quickly and accurately while accounting for suboptimal imaging from poor contrast opacification and/or beam hardening artifacts, unexpected pathologies, and reduction of unnecessary additional studies, and therefore, reduction of radiation dose and improvement of workflow in the emergency setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40866751What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.