Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866905›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025

A narrative review of deep learning applications in sports performance analysis: current practices, challenges, and future directions.

Yunke Jia, Norli Anida Abdullah, Hafiz Eliza, Qingbo Lu, Deyou Si, Hengwei Guo, Wenliang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yunke JiaInstitute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Norli Anida AbdullahCentre for Foundation Studies in Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia. norlie@um.edu.my.
Hafiz ElizaFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Qingbo LuPolice Officer Academy, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan, 250014, China.
Deyou SiSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Hengwei GuoSchool of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Wenliang WangDepartment of Athletic Training, Shanxi Sports Vocational College, Taiyuan, 030024, China.

Funding

University of Malaya: Universiti Malaya RG00/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of deep learning techniques into sports performance analysis has significantly advanced athlete monitoring, motion tracking, and predictive modelling. These advancements have significantly improved the ability to assess performance, optimize training strategies, and reduce injury risks. However, despite notable progress, challenges remain in standardizing methodologies, ensuring model reliability, and enhancing real-time application across various sports disciplines.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search of Web of Science Core Collection (WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL) for relevant studies published from 2015 to 2024, with no language restrictions. Eligible studies were those that explicitly applied deep learning techniques (such as convolutional and recurrent neural networks) to sports performance analysis tasks (e.g., action recognition and classification, motion detection and tracking, injury prediction) and reported their methodology and performance metrics. Key data, including sport type, application domain, and model type, were extracted for narrative synthesis.

resultsA total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a broad range of individual and team sports. Deep learning techniques in sports performance analysis were chiefly employed for action recognition, object detection and multi-target tracking, target classification, and performance or injury prediction. CNNs were the most common models for visual recognition tasks, while RNNs (including LSTMs) were frequently used for temporal sequence data. Most studies reported improved performance outcomes with deep learning; however, we observed considerable variability in data quality, model validation approaches, and cross-sport generalizability.

conclusionsDeep learning has demonstrated transformative potential in optimizing sports performance analysis by providing automated, data-driven insights. Future research should prioritize integrating multi-modal data sources, refining real-time analytics, and improving the adaptability of deep learning techniques across different sports contexts to support more precise and data-driven performance assessments.

Indexed as

Action recognition and classificationDeep learningInjury predictionMotion detection and trackingSports performance analysis

Identifiers

PMID40866905
PMCPMC12382096

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.