ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
The risk factors of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a cross-sectional study in Southwestern China.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has emerged as the fourth most prevalent mental disorder. However, the relationship between OCD and various factors, including demographic characteristics, lifestyles, and dietary habits remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the connection between various factors and OCD.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from January 14 to February 15, 2023, targeting the general population through an online platform. Demographic characteristics, lifestyles, dietary habits, and OCD symptoms were assessed using a validated classification scale. To identify potential risk factors for OCD, Lasso and logistic regression analyses were performed. Subsequently, the relative importance of these factors was evaluated through machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Back Propagation Neural Network.
resultsAmong the 1572 participants, 30.40% were categorized as high-risk for OCD. Logistic regression analysis revealed that having a medical history (OR = 1.709, 95% CI: 1.064-2.738), sleep disorders (OR = 1.460, 95% CI: 1.005-2.137), gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (OR = 1.562, 95% CI: 1.057-2.311), and abnormal defecation (OR = 1.431, 95% CI: 1.013-2.018) significantly increased the risk of OCD (all P < 0.05). These findings were consistent with the results from machine learning models, further supporting the critical role of these factors in OCD risk.
conclusionThis study identified medical history, GI symptoms, sleep disorders and picky eating as significant risk factors for OCD. These findings offer valuable insights into the etiology of OCD and suggest potential avenues for targeted interventions and preventive strategies aimed at reducing OCD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.