ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Effects of flanking regions on DNA i-motif folding and stability.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- G-Quadruplexes: Structural Diversity and Emerging Roles in Biomolecular Condensation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Minor groove tetrads: a potent and versatile capping interaction for i-motif structures.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
- How DNA secondary structures drive replication fork instability.DNA repair · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
i-Motifs (iMs) are four-stranded non-canonical nucleic acid secondary structures that are formed by cytosine-rich sequences. Putative iM-forming sequences are concentrated in human promoter and telomeric regions, suggesting possible biological roles. However, many iMs do not readily fold at neutral pH, sparking interest in factors that may stabilize them. We performed a systematic study on how the nucleotides flanking iMs affect their stabilities and folding kinetics. We found that the mere presence of flanking nucleotides led to dramatically slower folding and lower stability compared to isolated iMs. Conversely, complementary flanking nucleotides that comprise an inverted repeat and form a hairpin with the iM in the loop led to greater stability and faster folding than the iM on its own. A bioinformatic analysis of human promoter regions showed that the flanking regions are more likely than average to be complementary to each other, suggesting that this stabilization might be biologically relevant. We analyzed several naturally occurring iM sequences and found that complementary flanking regions substantially stabilized the structures (up to 64-fold faster folding and 17.2°C more stable). Our results show that the regions of DNA flanking iMs are an important and hitherto overlooked factor in iM folding and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.