ReviewCancers2025
Decoding the Epigenome: Comparative Analysis of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma and Leiomyoma.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in uterine leiomyoma: paired tissue-specific in-situ analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: Histone Modifications in Uterine Fibroids and Leiomyosarcoma.Biology · 2026Review
- The Evolving Molecular Landscape of Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2025Review
- MicroRNAs in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine leiomyomas (ULM) and uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) represent smooth muscle tumors with similar initial presentations but drastically different outcomes. This literature review analyzes the similarities and differences in their epigenetic profiles to identify diagnostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets that could improve clinical management. Both tumor types exhibit mostly distinct epigenetic signatures while sharing key pathway dysregulations. ULMS demonstrates global DNA hypomethylation, increased histone acetyltransferase activity, elevated Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) class I expression, and characteristic microRNA profiles. ULM displays focal methylation patterns and specific microRNA alterations that promote extracellular matrix accumulation. Despite these differences in epigenetic mechanisms, both tumors converge on dysregulation of signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, and Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-β) signaling, suggesting common downstream effects from distinct epigenetic origins. Understanding the shared and distinct epigenetic landscape between ULM and ULMS will enhance our insights into tumor pathogenesis and may offer promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.