Evidence mapPaperPMID 40867365Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Conceptual Framework for Nutritional Psychology as a New Field of Research.

Nanette Stroebele-Benschop, Vladimir Hedrih, Shereen Behairy, Nabila Pervaiz, Ephi Morphew-Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nanette Stroebele-BenschopDepartment of Applied Nutritional Psychology, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-6945
Vladimir HedrihFaculty of Philosophy, University of Niš, Ćirila i Metodija 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6341-3211
Shereen BehairyCenter for Nutritional Psychology, 467 Saratoga Ave, No 173, San José, CA 95129, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9318-0676
Nabila PervaizCenter for Nutritional Psychology, 467 Saratoga Ave, No 173, San José, CA 95129, USA.
Ephi Morphew-LuCenter for Nutritional Psychology, 467 Saratoga Ave, No 173, San José, CA 95129, USA.

Funding

Ministry of Science, Serbia; University of Nis, Serbia Contract No. 451-03-66/2024-03; project number 336/1-6-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many recent discoveries highlight the existence of a robust bidirectional link between nutrition and psychological processes. Despite these developments, the systematic and formalized study of this connection is only beginning to be undertaken, and nutritional psychology is not yet considered a formal area of study within the psychological sciences. This paper defines the scope of nutritional psychology through 6 core areas of conceptualization, each informed by an interdisciplinary and growing body of evidence spanning the psychological and nutritional sciences. These include the diet-conative/affective, diet-cognitive, diet-sensory/perception, diet-interoceptive, diet-psychosocial, and diet-environmental relationships. Introducing these conceptualizations contributes to the development of innovative interdisciplinary language, method, and conceptualization of the diet-mental health relationship within nutritional psychology.

Indexed as

conceptual frameworknutritionnutritional psychologypsychology

Identifiers

PMID40867365
PMCPMC12382769

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.