ReviewBiomolecules2025
Plant-Derived Vesicle-like Nanoparticles: Pioneering Sustainable and Effective Approaches for Tissue Repair and Regeneration.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The expanding role of biocompatible hydrogels in plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles for skin diseases: prospects and challenges.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Autoimmune Diseases: From Diagnostic Biomarkers to Engineered Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Dual Bioactive-Delivery Roles to Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential of Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanovesicles in Skin Tissue Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Greening Bone Healing: The Emerging Role of Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles in Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The Use of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine Applied to Cutaneous Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-derived vesicle-like nanoparticles (PDVLNs) are bioactive nanovesicles secreted by plant cells, emerging as a novel therapeutic tool for tissue repair and regeneration due to their low immunogenicity, intrinsic bioactivity, and potential as drug delivery carriers. This review examines PDVLNs' biogenesis mechanisms, isolation techniques, and compositional diversity, emphasizing their roles in promoting essential regenerative processes-cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, immune modulation, and angiogenesis. We explore their therapeutic applications across multiple tissue types, including skin, bone, neural, liver, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and dental tissues, using both natural and engineered PDVLNs in various disease models. Compared to mammalian exosomes, PDVLNs offer advantages such as reduced immune rejection and ethical concerns, enhancing their sustainability and appeal for regenerative medicine. However, challenges in clinical translation, including scalability, standardization, and safety remain. This paper consolidates current knowledge on PDVLNs, highlighting their versatility and providing insights into engineering strategies to optimize efficacy, ultimately outlining future research directions to advance their clinical potential. Plant vesicle-like nanoparticles (PDVLNs) may become a new avenue for the treatment of tissue injury, promoting tissue repair and regeneration through their intrinsic bioactivity or as drug delivery carriers. In addition, PDVLNs can be engineered and modified to achieve better results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.