ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Update on Role of Ionizing Radiation to Enhance Proliferation and Differentiation of Normal Stem Cells via Activation of NRF2 Pathway: Review.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (NRF2) as a Biomarker for Radiation Dosimetry and Health Risk Assessment: A Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ionizing radiation (IR) as a stress inducer has a significant impact on various normal stem cells differentiation through activation of various signaling pathways. Low levels of oxidative stress of IR may preserve or even enhance cell differentiation. In response to IR, reactive oxygen species (ROS) can activate various signaling pathways that promote cell differentiation, notably through the involvement of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2). NRF2 interacts with multiple pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin (osteogenesis), PPARγ (adipogenesis), and BDNF/TrkB (neurogenesis). This response is dose-dependent: low doses of IR activate NRF2 and support differentiation, while high doses can overwhelm the antioxidant system, resulting in cell death. However, the quality of various types of IR, such as proton and carbon ion radiation, may have a varied impact on stem cells (SCs) differentiation compared to X-rays. Hence, activation of the NRF2 signaling pathway in SCs and cell differentiation depends on the level of stress and the quality and quantity of IR. This review is an update to explore how IR modulates SCs fate toward osteogenic, adipogenic, and neurogenic lineages through the NRF2 signaling pathway. We highlight mechanistic insights, dose-dependent effects, and therapeutic implications, bridging gaps between experimental models and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.