ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Antibiotics in Mucogingival Surgery for Recession Treatment: A Narrative Review.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gingival recession is a common problem, particularly affecting oral health and esthetics, and its treatment involves surgical root coverage procedures. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the role of systemic antibiotic therapy in mucogingival surgery for recession treatment. The available literature does not support routine antibiotic use in systemically healthy patients undergoing recession coverage surgery. Indications for prophylactic antibiotics are restricted to individuals at high risk of infective endocarditis and immunocompromised patients with elevated susceptibility to surgical site infections. Although mucogingival surgeries are performed in a non-sterile environment, the risk of infection remains low when proper aseptic techniques and good preoperative tissue preparation are applied. The review emphasizes the importance of making clinical decisions that consider the patient's health status and are aligned with current recommendations. It also emphasizes the necessity for prospective studies to evaluate antibiotics' effect on recession coverage procedures outcome. To bridge the gap between contemporary evidence and clinical practice and to foster responsible use of antibiotics in periodontal plastic surgery, the authors of this review integrate current evidence and clinical guidelines into a practical tool designed to assist clinicians in making reasoned, evidence-based decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.